The latest news out of Rochester suggests that Kodak will be filing for banruptcy shortly. This will mark a sad end to an iconic American company. We all grew up with our "Kodak moments" and preserved our memories in photo albums and frames. I still sit down and look through my family's albums occasionally and these photos represent the only record I have of relatives and friends who've passed on. Kodak and its products have been an important part of my life.
What went wrong? The short answer is digital disruption. Digital cameras have now completely replaced traditional film technology. Kodak was a company built on market leadership in film. It simply has not been able to adapt to the world of digital imaging.
The irony is that a Kodak engineer, Steve Sasson, invented the diigital camera in 1975. You can read about it over at Fast Company Design. Here's a short video of Sasson created by David Friedman:
Inventor Portrait: Steven Sasson from David Friedman on Vimeo.
So why didn't Kodak dominate digital imaging the way it did film photography? I don't know the answer to this but I suspect a number of factors. The first is complacency. When you are literally printing money from film products, why jeopardize earnings by leading the way with a new technology? As we now see, product life cycles have shrunk in the digital age. In order to succeed, companies must be willing to kill off their popular products and introduce something new every 6-12 months. Look at the many iterations of Apple's iPod and iPhone.
There are other reasons. Digital imaging opened the market up to new competitors like Sony. Major camera companies like Nikon, Canon, and Olympus provided stiff competition as they moved into the new technology. Kodak was not really successful in developing new products or services to replace film sales. This is the real digital disruption that Kodak could not overcome. Revenues from film, processing and printing essentially disappeared when people began using their digital cameras. Consumers usually don't print their digital images at all, meaning that Kodak had to live or die with its digital cameras in a field crowded with strong competitors. They didn't make it.